October 17, 2019

Building competence

Earlier, Dr. Atif Mian, an economist at Princeton University, asked people through online surveys whether they thought corruption or lack of technology was a major problem in developed countries. Sixty-six people said that corruption is the most serious problem. Although Dr. Mean said that a successful country without corruption may be the best, voting for support lacks technology as a major issue.

I use it as a starting point in this regard. Success is not just about being personal. It also affects organizations and organizations. It is important to put the right people and the right people in the right place. However, it is also important to develop a system around those who provide them with the right rules and procedures and coordinate the content they provide in the right way. Instead, it may be more important than personal affairs.

A new employee in the country’s tax department complains that I belong to a society where you have no right to do good. However, no matter how bad the plan is, all his efforts are related to achieving the tax goal alone. On the surface, this seems to be a normal form, but it is not. Taxation is a certain goal. However, for countries and countries, the ultimate goal is to promote the growth and expansion of the country’s businesses. By using hooks or knobs and using various techniques to increase the number of targets, it will not be possible to create the best tax and tax systems in the country. It improperly chooses incentives and incentives for tax machines. Although his expertise is being explored to meet his needs, it is making the tax system extremely unbalanced and inappropriately chosen in the country.

for instance. What do we want the school to do? Train children and ensure that when they leave school, they have other skills, knowledge, skills and abilities. Is the motivation integrated into the learning process? Obviously, this is not the case. Our information (tests and exams) does not attempt to understand us. The teacher’s advice is not to learn. They can be mutually exclusive in meeting and meeting many technical and regulatory requirements, but not necessarily when the child’s educational outcome is affected.

Success is not just about being personal. It also affects organizations and organizations.

Over the past 15 years, we have built strong changes in the education system throughout the region. In at least two states, corruption and prejudice in the teaching industry have decreased. Teachers’ salaries and career paths have improved. Instead, careful monitoring and evaluation methods have been introduced. Courses and books have also changed. We have started new tests at all levels. The government says that in many states, the issue of spiritual schools and ghost teachers (corruption) has been resolved. However, according to most of the programs we have available, learning outcomes have never been so low. What does it describe?

Collaboration in groups and organizations can be a good explanation. For the education sector, learning has no synergy – just like the tax department: there is no consensus on teaching.

In a recent interview, Dr. Asim Khwaja, a lecturer at Harvard University’s Kennedy School, said that we should focus on high productivity. We need to convince ourselves and our organizations and organizations to collaborate on these benefits. This seems to be a good idea to leave. We need to think critically about the potential benefits of its operations to individuals, departments, institutions and organizations.

For businesses, it may mean more exposure, greater demand, higher quality, more diversity, entrepreneurship, exports, and more. For schools or teaching departments, learning experience should be seen as a major factor. For the tax department, you want to realize some funds, but it should be a medium- and long-term goal in business management, so that raising funds becomes a key area.

The power of an individual, organization or organization can be judged by using electronic devices to enhance its operations. But this requires a deeper discussion of what higher productivity means for each department, individual or organization, and what we want to maximize profits. If possible, the possibility can be judged by ensuring that the goal is continued.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *